Dominant Currencies Through History: Why USD is at Risk as a Reserve Currency and What Would Replace It

dominant currencies throughout history 071717

As if we needed a friendly reminder, history tells us every dominant global currency shines brightly under the international spotlight… until it doesn’t.

The greenback has maintained its status as global reserve currency since shortly after the Second World War. It has limped through US President Nixon’s termination of gold convertibility in 1971, a historic global financial crisis emanating from the US, several asset bubble busts, and a prolonged 8+ year stretch of zero interest rate policy (ZIRP) paired with accelerated new money supply by the Federal Reserve’s QE programs.

Strategic political alliances with questionable partners at times and tragic international conflicts likely played a role in every empire maintaining dominance of its currency in global trade. This is nothing new, unique, nor surprising if viewed from a historical perspective.

Empires have gone to the greatest lengths possible, by any means necessary, to ensure global trade is conducted with their currency of choice. That is because the wealth of their citizens, businesses, and governments have depended on it.

Global demand for one’s currency ensures superior financing terms to invest in the things that increase living standards and real wealth. It also insures value preservation of a nation’s (or currency union’s) savings. With reserve currency status comes immense privilege and more room for error than enjoyed by those without it.

More room for error does not mean infinite room for error. Unfortunately, squandering wealth and credibility are much easier and faster to execute than building them. Human nature is highly cyclical and dynamic. Once an empire goes through the exhausting process of winning the hard way, it wants to enjoy the fruits of its labor the easy way.

Complacency sets in. Greed, impatience, and hubris replace the blood, sweat, and tears on which the empire was built. Short cuts become misinterpreted by common wisdom as “the new way to work smarter, not harder.” Mal-investment on unproductive activities are implemented to improve short term optics at the expense of long term real gains. Power breeds corruption. Corruption deteriorates trust in the social contract gluing a society together. The political power cycle peaks and begins to reverse.

The basis of Keynesian economics and “stimulating demand” now by stealing it from the future is inherently a product of short-cut thinking exhibited by an empire’s coddled intellectuals with no skin in the game. Why ever make difficult political decisions to prioritize finite resources or tighten one’s own belt when you can simply goose the economy for awhile longer with borrowed funds or freshly printed money?

Like the academics of previous eras, the academics of the current one have decided they have a short-cut with groundbreaking, new ideas: create new money from thin air and buy most of the bonds responsible for setting interest rates to keep rates low. Ah ha! Why hasn’t anybody else been so clever?

Of course, there is nothing groundbreaking whatsoever about demand-driven Keynesian economics. Different tactics, same tricks. There are no free lunches in economics over the long run. Eventually the long run becomes today.

Today’s central bankers and politicians have decided they are intelligent enough to increasingly control market economies better than all of those who have failed before them trying to do the same, and certainly better than a large number of diverse market participants with skin in the game from various perspectives competing for the best deals (aka, “markets”). The more things change, the more they stay the same.

Too much market intervention by central planners has some of the nastiest long term side effects imaginable, even with relatively good intentions in the short run. Unexpected losses in purchasing power, real wealth, and real wages have silently been responsible for contributing to wars and other bloody conflicts (ie. hyperinflation in Germany in the 1920s, 2011’s Arab Spring, today’s Venezuela) with fewer mentions than deserved. Nothing evaporates complacency and fuels anger like losing everything almost overnight.

When a debt situation deteriorates past the point of no return to a level of de facto insolvency, governments choose creating money from thin air to pay the bills 99% of the time rather than not paying them when presented with one or the other as the unfortunate final options on the table. This eventually, if not immediately, causes said money to lose its value.

In fact, even though the dollar is still the most widely held global reserve currency, it has lost approximately 95% of its purchasing power since the Federal Reserve was created in 1913 to manage the nation’s money supply. Throughout most of this time, the deterioration in value has been manageable because interest rates were high enough to compensate savers.

Now we have a policy of financial repression where savers are forced to lose real purchasing power on their savings without being compensated by adequate interest earnings. This has been a direct transfer of wealth from savers to debtors and government entities. That fact is yet to be fully appreciated by the public, broadly speaking.

When a currency rapidly loses purchasing power, faith and trust in its future value begin to erode even faster. Lenders of debt in said currency demand higher interest rates to compensate for the risk and expectations of additional losses in value.

High interest rates make it more costly for individuals to make large purchases or maintain their living standards in a cyclical economic downturn. High rates make it more difficult for new businesses to form and for existing businesses to expand. Most importantly, high rates make it terribly difficult for indebted governments to continue spending more than they collect in taxes, or even to pay back previous debts.

Yet, sometimes higher interest rates are exactly what is needed in order to ensure a moderately painful period of belt tightening rather than a full blown crisis or economic collapse down the road. This in return helps attract investment capital seeking higher rates of return to a struggling nation (or region) in need of it, thus creating demand for the beleaguered currency once again and completing the cycle.

This, anyways, is how it is supposed to work in a market-based economic system: self-correcting periods of relative economic strength and weakness with a bias toward long term wealth creation. This holds true even in hybrid economic systems where governments intervene to nudge economies in the direction of desired political outcomes without excessive force or explicit price controls.

But that is not the modus operandi in the current Keynesian global central banking regime. We have seen one experimental intervention policy after another enacted essentially in coordination by advanced economy central banks in order to keep the economic flame flickering and avoid another global recession. Economic nature has not been allowed to run its course with natural corrections in recent years, with few exceptions.

Equity volatility is at all-time lows. As in, forever. The Bank of Japan is buying stock ETFs at multi-year high prices, is forcing a negative interest rate at the short end of the debt curve, and is even manipulating the shape of the curve deeper out by instilling an unlimited bond buying program to keep 10 year JGB rates at precisely zero while there is no apparent recession to fight. The European Central bank is printing 60 billion euros per month and spending some of the money on bonds that have negative yields.

One would naturally wonder why central bankers have spent so much precious monetary ammo and political capital fighting the natural business cycle during a period of time in which the economic indicators are looking quite strong overall? They have explicitly pledged to do “whatever it takes” on a number of occasions to prop up the banking system and keep interest rates ultra low long past a time of actual crisis.

The answer is frightening: there is way too much global debt without the growth to support it and another major recession in several advanced economies could expose an insolvent global monetary system. What would happen if in a recession the US returned to $1-2 trillion dollar deficits with no end in sight and debt-to-GDP already stretched near maximum sustainable levels? If the deficit already looks increasingly bloated during a time of quasi full employment, and political dysfunction is preventing anything sensible from correcting course on the ship before it is too late, what does “too late” look like?

The Keynesian groundwork has been laid in the public discourse already. There will almost certainly be so-called “helicopter money” policies enacted by emergency decree during the next recession–direct coordination between the government and the Fed to monetize debt with no questions whatsoever about what is going on.

The Fed will create money to purchase not only financial assets, but will back the US Treasury with newly created money so it can cover its bills without technically “defaulting.” Financial repression will be relentlessly pursued to stop people from getting their money out of the banking system because private savings will be used to bail out unsustainable public debt one way or another. Either you spend it quickly to “stimulate demand” or watch it’s value diminish before your eyes.

If ever used, helicopter money will end USD’s reserve currency dominance reign.  It would no longer be trusted as a store of value, to the extent it even is now. The only way to effectively enact such heavy handed policies is through financial repression, limiting the use of cash, and quasi currency controls because otherwise there would be a massive run on the financial system. Everybody would try to get rid of their fiat currency deposits at the same time to instead acquire other assets that are superior stores of value.

Competing non-fiat assets would then be under the spotlight and removed as an option similar to how FDR made it illegal for private citizens to own gold in 1933 by executive order. People literally went to jail for owning gold. That type of policy would surely spark a much harsher public backlash this time around, resulting in at least a partial departure from the current USD dominated post-Bretton Woods monetary system.

The only way to prevent this from happening is for the US to ignite sustained GDP growth above 3% while gradually reducing debt-to-GDP over time.  Or, the government chambers could join together to enact unpopular budget cuts on things like entitlements and military spending, without diminishing tax revenues. Seeming how the same legislators have already made a mockery of the supposed hard cap budget sequestration enacted in 2013 by largely ignoring it, as well as publicly declaring that it will let its own healthcare system fail due to current political dysfunction,  the hill to climb seems steep for the greenback to remain the dominant reserve currency.

Contrary to the graphic at the top of this post, the Chinese yuan is not necessarily going to be a better alternative to the dollar. China’s debt problem might even be worse than the US’s. Traditional “paper” fiat currencies in general are highly subject to central bank oversupply and deteriorating faith in traditional institutions globally.

Digital blockchain assets such as bitcoin could be a viable alternative or complement to traditional fiat, at least eventually, but related businesses such as cryptocurrency exchanges could be targeted heavily in an intensified financial repression regime. It is still very easy to imagine demand for digital assets surging exponentially higher than supply with or without a helicopter money scenario taking place in the future.

The next official reserve currency is likely to be plural. SDRs, or Special Drawing Rights, are currency units composed of several major currencies that the International Monetary Fund (IMF) is increasingly highlighting as a better solution than USD for bank reserves. The problem with SDRs is that they are still based entirely on fiat currencies and are also centrally controlled, leaving them politically vulnerable and prone to perpetual devaluation.

The monetary system will become increasingly decentralized as a natural response to too much centralized planning reliance and risk concentration. SDR’s and even government sanctioned crypto assets will include USD in the global financial system, albeit with a diminished role from its current dominance in energy commerce and bank reserves.

On an individual level, diversification into prime real estate, land, precious metals, and crypto assets should perform well in real terms during a future recession. As mentioned in several earlier posts, Assist FX does not expect an imminent near term recession. Nonetheless, it would be a good idea to do some planning and perhaps gradually accumulate assets on a regular interval able to outperform traditional fiat currency bank deposits should you see the same risks that we do longer term. We are closer to an economic peak than a trough at this stage of the credit cycle.

Odds of a recession occurring in the next 1-3 years are likely about 50-55%. Beyond 3 years the odds increase dramatically as it becomes apparent full monetary normalization is no longer possible absent an unexpected renaissance of productivity and growth in an aging demographics world.

We are past the point of no return yet not quite to a dead end. That leaves us with an ideal opportunity to assess risks realistically now and plan for an uncertain future where USD could lose its dominant reserve currency role in the world and instead become part of a diversified currency basket mainly featuring SDR’s.

Inadequate Historical Valuation Measures and What Comes Next in This Monetary Bubble Investing Frontier

  • Market analysts far and wide continue to pound their fists on the table daily about overstretched equity valuations (and many other assets for that matter) putting risk markets in dangerous territory ripe for an imminent sizable correction, or worse.
  • Indeed, global risk markets are tremendously overvalued by almost any historical measure. It takes a heroic effort of wishful thinking to believe otherwise.
  • If we take a look at the S&P500 as one prime example, 18 out of 20 of the most widely followed valuation measures are flashing “overbought” with red blinking lights. Four of the measures indicate an S&P500 at least 50% overvalued, historically speaking.

sp500 valuation metrics 052317

  • Therein lies the problems with historical valuation analysis: first, it is based on backward looking data only. Additionally, valuation alone has proven to be an inadequate timing mechanism.
  • Assist FX does not see the historically overstretched valuations currently witnessed in global equities, real estate, and bonds imminently leading to a near term risk-off crash as the base case, although that is always a possibility. Valuations will likely become even more stretched first. Additionally, the current bubble investing environment might lead to a different ultimate resolution than the traditional risk-off market correction/crash many are accustomed to witnessing. We see a different range of scenarios playing out involving capital eventually being less attracted to paper/fiat based financial assets and more attracted to physical-based assets and decentralized stores of value. Imbalances may very well be resolved via asset depreciation in real terms rather than in nominal terms. An occurrence of this nature is not likely to materialize for some time, but risks are building daily as global debt pressures become less and less reversible.
  • Key question: Is this time really different? Answer: yes and no. There has never been another time in history where global central banks have been this supportive of asset prices all at once. During a time marked by real estate bidding wars and new all time highs in global stock indexes, central banks still feel the need to create more than $200 billion dollars per month from thin air to buy mortgage bonds, stock ETFs, and government bonds. Markets are rigged, but they are actually rigged to rise in order to supposedly create a self fulfilling “wealth effect” of unrealized asset gains fueling greater economic activity and confidence.
  • You can’t skirt the basic laws of market supply and demand forever. Reference Venezuela as one of hundreds/thousands of unfortunate examples involving central planners throwing a grand party on borrowed time that ends in widespread misery as soon as the bill comes due. Today’s advanced economies are not being operated with the same extreme mismanagement as in Venezuela, but less severe policy errors are impossible to ignore when cumulatively compounded over time.
  • Current state of global monetary policy: The Fed, ECB, BOJ, PBOC, BOC, SNB, RBA, RBNZ, and other central banks have enabled massive asset price inflation to grow unchecked across several asset classes, particularly in real estate and equities. They do this in the name of fighting a phantom crisis of consumer price deflation which only seems to exist in heavily adjusted inflation index data conjured up by statisticians who know the entire political and industrial complex desires the lowest official readings possible. The appearance of low inflation makes GDP look higher, wages look stronger, and government transfer payments linked to inflation indexes lower. Understated inflation indexes are to politicians and executives what Photoshop editing is to swimsuit models.
  • What many well-meaning analysts have been getting wrong is just how long this type of central planning charade can go on before supply and demand imbalances are aggressively shocked back to reality in a reversion to the mean event. That is because this is not only a function of economic mathematics but also of mass psychology. Dispassionate valuation modeling alone is not enough for a prudent money manager. One must also have their finger on the pulse of market psychology to know when the music has stopped and isn’t coming back on for a very long time during the metaphorical musical chairs game also known as investing in a bubble environment. Assist FX research indicates the music isn’t quite ready to stop–we aren’t there yet. But don’t pile into expensive asset classes with huge leverage either. Stay vigilant and nimble.

Bottom Line: Assist FX has believed for some time, and continues to believe, that central banks have “doubled down” on a quasi commitment to keep asset prices elevated by doing “whatever it takes” as their primary strategy to minimize the onset and severity of cyclical recessions. This improves the appearance of macro economic activity in the near term while adding to dangerous systemic risks longer term. It is difficult for financial markets continually pumped with newly created money and ultra low interest rates to simultaneously crash and stay down. It tends to materialize with earnings multiple expansions in stocks, cap rate contractions in real estate, and overall suppressed volatility, making nearly all asset classes appear “overvalued” for a much longer period of time than many market observers believe can occur.

Make no mistake. We are in yet another central bank inspired asset bubble that was engineered to “fix” the aftermath of the last two central bank inspired asset bubbles. The imbalances grow more pronounced with each reflated bubble because instead of having moderate, occasional recessions where the most unproductive debt is reset via bankruptcies, you have massive unproductive debt imbalances augmented much further by artificially cheap credit and financial engineering. This dramatically increases systemic risk associated with major financial crises, economic meltdowns, and complete monetary system resets. Yet, bubble environments can exist for very protracted periods of time.

Nearly everyone who thinks about these types of economic topics knows at some level, whether more conscious or subconscious, that the current central bank driven free-lunch asset holders are enjoying today are creating the types of systemic risks that endanger the global monetary system tomorrow. This will push private citizens worldwide to increasingly seek alternative stores of value for their savings. That is why demand for decentralized, alternative stores of value such as block-chain technology-based digital currencies is set to accelerate. The block-chain trend is just getting started. As for traditional financial markets, we see a continuation of the type of slow grind, nearly dead volatility asset price levitation to continue for the time being.

Euro Set to Rise on Reversal of Deeply Negative Bond Yields

Real interest rates are deeply negative in much of the Eurozone due to the combination of interest rate repression by the ECB’s bond buying program plus above-target inflation.

Take a look at the real 10y German bund yield below.

bund - cpi feb 2017

As I have pointed out, the further behind the curve a central bank gets, the harsher the snap back toward normalization is once the process to normalize is anticipated by market participants. No central bank is further behind the curve right now than the ECB.

Investors are pricing in two or three 25 basis point Fed rate hikes this year. No such expectations exist in the Eurozone due to Mario Draghi’s persistent, stubborn denials of even discussing normalization with the Governing Council—yet. We may be at a turning point in market expectations for the euro as the severity of political risk subsides.

The 2yr yield spread divergence in US-German government debt is at extreme levels of 221 basis points. You could cruise a row of mega tanker ocean liners through that spread. This suggests a higher EUR/USD if and when the spread narrows to historically normal levels, but most likely long before then. The 10y Bund real interest rate yield is so deeply negative during a period of increasing economic activity and inflation that probabilities suggest a brisk reversal higher in yields the moment markets start pricing in a post-QE Europe.

The exact timing of when the yield spread will close is not as critical as knowing what will happen when it does. Once the sea tide resides back from the beach, it will be apparent holders of European government debt were swimming without bathing suits. They will likely be standing along side short sellers of the euro who will also be… exposed.

In summary, now is probably as good of a time as any to make sure you aren’t holding long European bonds that look and sound an awful lot like time bombs. The same could be said for short euro positions. Long EUR/USD and EUR/GBP entries on political fear-based dips will provide favorable asymmetric risk/reward opportunities.

Market Impacts of Economic Populism and Elevated Debt Levels

The politics of trade protectionism, nationalism, and anti-immigration are the match which will ignite dormant inflationary gasses bubbling underneath the surface after years of short-sighted monetary policy experiments.

Governments have failed for several years to enact meaningful structural reforms that would set economies on a more sustainable path. This is just now beginning to lead to the realization of painful, inflationary solutions. Losses in real wealth and spending power for many advanced economy citizens in the name of “economic competitiveness” and “growing out of debt” are under way. Central banks are somewhat subtly engineering an inflation overshoot as it is implicitly understood that government gridlock, corruption, and incompetence are preventing wiser legislative solutions from coming to fruition. Central banks have been “the only game in town,” as coined by Allianz chief economic advisor, Mohamed El-Erian. In other words, growing out of debt with real growth, innovation, and productivity gains is much less likely at this point than inflating out of it with falling real wages, lower standards of living, and stagflation.

Real average hourly earnings in the US fell by 0.5% in January versus the prior month; nominal wages rose by 0.1% while the BLS CPI-U Consumer Price Index increased by 0.6%. Even excluding energy, nearly any measure of consumer prices leads to a trend of deteriorating real incomes and saving rates going forward. Bank of England Governor Mark Carney has warned of accelerated losses in purchasing power on the way for the United Kingdom.

While the UK’s 20.5% year-over-year manufacturing input price inflation in January was largely inspired by pound sterling depreciation after voting to leave the European Union, the reflation trend is a global phenomenon. Germany, Norway, Sweden, and countless emerging markets including Mexico, China, Chile, Turkey, and Egypt, are experiencing a pace of wholesale (PPI) price increases faster than has been witnessed since at least 2011. PPI increases of this magnitude are generally a leading indicator for CPI to follow suit, though wholesale businesses will absorb a portion of the input cost increases through margin contraction.

I have been warning about building inflation risks for the past couple of years. Contrary to what new Keynesian economic advocates will have you believe with their gravity and logic defying models, there exists a simple mathematical problem of too much debt and not enough productivity to legitimately grow out of it in developed nations with aging demographics.

Prominent demand-side economists such as Larry Summers have been advocating currency debasement, money printing, debt-fueled fiscal stimulus, and interest rate repression continually since the financial crisis. Paul Krugman famously called on then-Fed Chair Alan Greenspan to create a housing bubble in 2002 to replace the .com bubble bust. This cyclical mentality of monetary bubble manufacturing has been blind to the secular economic rot festering underneath those same policies. It has also had unfettered control of the levers within the world’s most powerful central banks for the past 20 years. Financial history books will eventually hold these highly flawed policies and their proponents accountable for doing little other than fueling the next great bubble—the credit bubble. Or, as I alternatively call it, the global QE bubble.

Keynesian economists calling for debt-financed spending, ultra-easy monetary policy, and demand-pull inflation during a period of economic stagnation is nothing new. It isn’t only the usual suspects, however, singing the inflationary gospel now. That is why we are at such a significant inflection point. The populist right is winning political momentum and its policy prescriptions are astoundingly inflationary—border taxes, import tariffs, currency debasement, immigration restrictions limiting the labor market supply, etc.

Economic populism is credited with giving birth to the new political paradigm. Its recent “scalp prizes” were supporters of the UK staying in the European Union and the entire US political establishment. Lines between the traditional political left and right have become blurred in the developed world. Right wing populist candidates are closely vying for power in the least likely places on earth one would expect—the Netherlands (Geert Wilders) and France (Marine Le Pen).

Established politicians and their party infrastructures are more at odds with each other than they have been in decades. Yet, grass roots supporters of what are typically opposing parties have converged as strange bedfellows in supporting several key areas of common ground: reforming global trade rules with the intention of better protecting their own domestic workers, reducing cronyism within big government and big business, decriminalizing marijuana, and protecting civil liberties from government overreach, to name a few.

US President Donald Trump has lashed out concerning a too-strong dollar and flirted with altering a decades-long US strong dollar policy. France Presidential Candidate Marine Le Pen wants to leave the euro currency bloc, take control of the central bank, kick out the immigrants, and print money to fund social spending; and this is coming from someone widely considered to be of the political right wing. What could possibly go wrong? This has not gone unnoticed in the FX market or the French bond market. I’m afraid we haven’t seen anything yet, however.

These inflationary macro trends will continue to surprise many, even if Le Pen is not victorious in the France elections this year. The easy monetary policy leanings of the establishment-left and nationalistic fiscal policies of the populist-right are in alignment. They are both clamoring for a wave of higher consumer prices to erroneously “fix” structural problems of high debt and low labor productivity. It is completely illogical and will only have the opposite effect, but that is beside the point.

I sensed a stronger populist undertone than given credit by the press before the UK referendum to leave the EU and before the US presidential election. My base case doesn’t currently have Marine Le Pen winning the France presidency this year, but there is little room for error in the upcoming election season in Europe. Economic populism is here to stay due to the alignment of interests between grass roots supporters of opposing parties against political elites in general.

Punishing the globalist-minded political elites who have presided over declines in living standards for middle and working class Average Joes throughout the developed world is no longer exclusive property of the hard left. The populist right wants to make its dent in the elites’ armor as well. The result of anti-elite political sentiment will have profound impacts on financial markets for the next several years and some of these impacts are relatively predictable.

Behind the tire marks of the new anti-elite political paradigm exists a trail of how we got here. Gross mismanagement of government budgets globally and the inability of labor to share in the economic gains created during the previous period of high productivity have contributed to a deep structural hole that might prove too deep to escape with a “healthy” type of growth. This is especially the case given the drop off in productivity in recent years and aging demographics. It has also created outrage amongst the masses who feel duped for trying to play by the same rules the elite class gamed in order to gain even more wealth; ie, the carried interest deduction allowing billionaire money managers to pay lower tax rates than electricians.

The current hot topic of “low productivity” is often lazily discussed as if it is the reason real wages have been stagnant (or falling) for decades. Low productivity is more of a post-Great Financial Crisis phenomenon probably caused by a misalignment of corporate incentives. With Zero Interest Rate Policy (ZIRP) and central bank quantitative easing (QE) flooding the capital markets with fresh cash, why invest in new equipment to improve worker productivity when you can simply borrow for a negligible cost and use the cash to immediately fund common stock buybacks, dividends, and M&A? Excessively easy monetary policy distorted market dynamics and reduced incentives to increase productivity. Additionally, governments used the temporary benefits of monetary stimulus as cover to avoid taking more unpopular measures to improve their structural situations.

A decade of global central bank activism paired with several dysfunctional governments did not permanently address very many structural issues. What it did is limit the immediate severity of the 2008/2009 financial crisis, inflate asset prices to bubble territory, boost employment mainly for lower paying service sector jobs, and change the composition of the next recession to an inflationary debt reset rather than a deflationary bankruptcy-based debt reset, thus destroying responsible savers to the benefit of debtors.

What kind of a market environment will persist in a political climate of economic populism combined with excessive global debt? Real wages will take a beating initially, as will fixed income markets. Equity indices will be tugged higher on the illusion of inflated corporate earnings and then yanked lower after resulting interest rate spikes. FX rates will have multiple “Brexit-esque” caliber events, causing pockets of illiquidity and displacements in rates. A targeted Chinese yuan devaluation of 15% or more within 1-2 years is likely as one prime example. Any implementation of border taxes or tariffs designed to protect domestic workers will likely be met with retaliatory actions that will greatly harm those same workers, unless the new trade rules are negotiated and agreed upon by both sides. Bilateral trade deal negotiations and politics could be the chief drivers of global markets for the next five years in the same way monetary policy divergences drove markets in the past five years.

The best case scenario is governments use a period of unsustainable increases in budgets and financing costs over the coming years as political cover to get leaner, more efficient, and more responsive to the needs of their citizens (hopefully this doesn’t cause readers to erupt into spontaneous laughter). In a glass-half-full world, wages will eventually catch up to price increases. Those who are unemployed, retired, renting their primary residence, net savers, or whose incomes are not closely tied to actual inflation will feel like they were on the wrong side of a crash. It probably won’t be a traditional nominal price crash so much as a crash in real terms; however, there could be flashes of both.

Ultimately, the same forces that have always been responsible for real wage increases and higher standards of living still hold true: high productivity, broadly enjoyed technological innovations that lower costs without displacing too many workers, and a peacetime dividend enjoyed during times of no major war conflicts. Does it seem like we are headed toward this scenario?

Remember this: when someone tells you the surest path to economic prosperity involves devaluing your savings, lowering your real wages, and paying down old debt with new debt—run away and call the police—someone is trying to rob you.

ECB’s Inflation Target Hit Early: Time to Move the Goal Posts

The Eurozone Consumer Price Index registered an increase of 1.8% year-over-year in January versus December’s reading of 1.1%. This means the ECB’s inflation target mandate of “close but below 2%” has effectively been satisfied at least a year earlier than intended.

Next comes a series of goal post moving exercises. Policy makers and central bankers in Europe desire continued stimulus pumping to help limp past the banking crisis in Italy, the ongoing debt crisis in Greece, and significant political risk posed by elections in France, Germany, and the Netherlands.

Expect central planners in Europe to disregard the steepening inflation trend for as long as possible. Public discourse will gravitate toward new arguments downplaying headline CPI. These will include shifting focus to core CPI, blaming transitory effects from higher energy prices, highlighting unfavorable base effect comparisons from the prior year, and potentially even fears of trade barriers constraining future global growth. The ECB will get further behind the curve to the chagrin of Germany. Bullish pressure will continue to boil hotter for the euro currency unless politics get in the way.

Why ECB Dovishness Will Actually Boost the Euro

Mario Draghi is one of the better communicators in modern central banking. Everything he conveyed during the ECB’s 19th of January press conference was intentional. Each time he was presented with questions about whether the ECB should consider winding down its bond buying program faster in light of strengthening economic and inflation data he repeatedly stated, “it wasn’t discussed.” The last thing the native Italian central bank chief wants is a market eager to front run an accelerated QE taper, causing an unstable spike in Eurozone bond yields and in the value of the euro. Any tiny crumb of hope tossed to the hawks risks massive market repercussions similar to the Bernanke-inspired taper tantrum of 2013. Maintaining ultra loose monetary policy risks a rubber band snap back toward tightening the instant the tension is relieved.

ECB’s Nowotny took the prevailing dovish tone a step further today by saying the ECB won’t discuss tapering at the March meeting either. Euro currency pairs quickly dropped 50 pips. But the move was short lived. The euro boomeranged right back up and then some. It is proving difficult at the moment to sustain EUR/USD below 1.07 without a new politically inspired catalyst. So what happened? Why are dovish ECB comments from officials either not effective or even counterproductive in the sense they are actually boosting the euro?

The ECB is undoubtedly behind the curve in tightening monetary policy. Markets know it. Inflation is sharply advancing higher in Germany to the point where it has been front and center headline news in the newspapers. Germany may be known for outsized fears of inflation but this time it is correct to have such views. Wholesale inflation (PPI) is gapping higher at an even faster rate in global regions which typically lead the others – China to name a big one.

If you believe as I do that the ECB is behind the curve in tightening monetary policy then you’d also believe digging in with continued dovishness puts it even further behind the curve. As long as you think the ECB has enough credibility to eventually catch up in the tightening cycle then the more dovish it is now, the faster it will have to tighten later to catch up. Dovish statements and actions will only strengthen the euro at this point because it raises the bar for how fast the ECB will need to tighten later. The only issue waiting in the wings with the potential to drag down the euro in a big way is anti-EU political risk. Consider monetary policy jawboning to be rendered ineffective or even counterproductive from here on out in inflicting losses to the single market currency. ECB dovishness will only boost the euro further.